Learning Methods Used by Arabic Language Teachers during the New Normal Period of COVID-19
Downloads
The attention of language learning experts conducting various research and studies to determine the effectiveness and success of Arabic learning methods. Communication strategy is one of the strategies used in learning Arabic, which focuses on communication skills. This strategy is used in an analysis that uses a literature strategy where the data is based on various significant reference sources in this discussion. The results of this study indicate that learning methods based on the communicative approach emphasize listening and speaking skills; the learning objectives to be achieved through these various methods are so that students can communicate in the target language being studied whenever and wherever that is. Suitable for language learning. Arabic language education research has reviewed a lot about learning at the elementary, middle, and high school education levels, most of which show theoretical and practical aspects. This study aims to reveal the application of PAUD Arabic education theory and look at the strategies used by teachers or schools and things that influence the initial inculcation of Arabic language learning in early Childhood by using vocabulary strategies.
Adhya, D., & Panda, S. (2022). Teacher educators’ attitude towards technology-enabled learning and its incorporation into teaching-learning during and post-pandemic. Educational Media International, 59(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2022.2101204
Amrouch, H., Pahwa, G., Gaidhane, A. D., Dabhi, C. K., Klemme, F., Prakash, O., & Chauhan, Y. S. (2020). Impact of Variability on Processor Performance in Negative Capacitance FinFET Technology. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 67(9), 3127–3137. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2020.2990672
Appiah-Otoo, I., & Song, N. (2021). The impact of ICT on economic growth-Comparing rich and poor countries. Telecommunications Policy, 45(2), 102082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102082
Asano, M., Tai, B. C., Yeo, F. Y., Yen, S. C., Tay, A., Ng, Y. S., De Silva, D. A., Caves, K., Chew, E., Hoenig, H., & Koh, G. C. (2021). Home-based tele-rehabilitation presents comparable positive impact on self-reported functional outcomes as usual care: The Singapore Tele-technology Aided Rehabilitation in Stroke (STARS) randomised controlled trial. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 27(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19868905
Aslani, A., Bakhtiar, A., & Akbarzadeh, M. H. (2019). Energy-efficiency technologies in the building envelope: Life cycle and adaptation assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.014
Avom, D., Nkengfack, H., Fotio, H. K., & Totouom, A. (2020). ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120028
Callegari, A., Bolognesi, S., Cecconet, D., & Capodaglio, A. G. (2020). Production technologies, current role, and future prospects of biofuels feedstocks: A state-of-the-art review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 50(4), 384–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1629801
Chatti, W., & Majeed, M. T. (2022). Information communication technology (ICT), smart urbanization, and environmental quality: Evidence from a panel of developing and developed economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, 132925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132925
Chien, F., Anwar, A., Hsu, C.-C., Sharif, A., Razzaq, A., & Sinha, A. (2021). The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technology in Society, 65, 101587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101587
Cooper, J., Dubey, L., & Hawkes, A. (2022). The life cycle environmental impacts of negative emission technologies in North America. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.010
Cruchade, H., Pouilloux, Y., Beauchet, R., & Pinard, L. (2022). Cleaner technology for the production of linear long-chain ?-olefins through a “millisecond” oxidative cracking process: A positive impact of the reactant carbon chain length. New Journal of Chemistry, 46(8), 3570–3577. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ05910F
Dagher, G. G., Mohler, J., Milojkovic, M., & Marella, P. B. (2018). Ancile: Privacy-preserving framework for access control and interoperability of electronic health records using blockchain technology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.014
de Oliveira Garcia, W., Amann, T., Hartmann, J., Karstens, K., Popp, A., Boysen, L. R., Smith, P., & Goll, D. (2020). Impacts of enhanced weathering on biomass production for negative emission technologies and soil hydrology. Biogeosciences, 17(7), 2107–2133. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2107-2020
Desmond, D., Layton, N., Bentley, J., Boot, F. H., Borg, J., Dhungana, B. M., Gallagher, P., Gitlow, L., Gowran, R. J., Groce, N., Mavrou, K., Mackeogh, T., McDonald, R., Pettersson, C., & Scherer, M. J. (2018). Assistive technology and people: A position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1471169
?oki?, O. J., Bori?i?, M. M. D., & Jeli?, M. S. (2022). Comparing ICT With Physical Manipulative Supported Learning of 3D Geometry in Elementary School. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1623–1654. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211001319
Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., & Harris, B. (2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: Domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341
Dwyer, A., Jones, C., & Rosas, L. (2019). What digital technology do early childhood educators use and what digital resources do they seek? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119841459
Estriegana, R., Medina-Merodio, J.-A., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 135, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010
Fleming, G. A., Petrie, J. R., Bergenstal, R. M., Holl, R. W., Peters, A. L., & Heinemann, L. (2020). Diabetes Digital App Technology: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. A Consensus Report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group. Diabetes Care, 43(1), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0062
Flores-Camacho, F., Gallegos-Cázares, L., García-Rivera, B.-E., & Báez-Islas, A. (2019). Efectos de los laboratorios de ciencias con TIC en la comprensión y representación de los conocimientos científicos en estudiantes del bachillerato en un contexto escolar cotidiano. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 10(29), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2019.29.527
Gebremariam, A. T., Di Maio, F., Vahidi, A., & Rem, P. (2020). Innovative technologies for recycling End-of-Life concrete waste in the built environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104911
Gil, T. (2019). Meaningful Learning through Art: Nature Photography, Haiku Writing, Mobile Technologies and Social Media as a Path to Oneself. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(2), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12192
Gonzales, A. L., McCrory Calarco, J., & Lynch, T. (2020). Technology Problems and Student Achievement Gaps: A Validation and Extension of the Technology Maintenance Construct. Communication Research, 47(5), 750–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218796366
Graf, B., Kapfer, T., Ostertag, F., & Hinrichs, J. (2020). New experimental set-up for testing microwave technology to continuously heat fouling-sensitive food products like milk concentrates. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 65, 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102453
Guijas, C., Montenegro-Burke, J. R., Domingo-Almenara, X., Palermo, A., Warth, B., Hermann, G., Koellensperger, G., Huan, T., Uritboonthai, W., Aisporna, A. E., Wolan, D. W., Spilker, M. E., Benton, H. P., & Siuzdak, G. (2018). METLIN: A Technology Platform for Identifying Knowns and Unknowns. Analytical Chemistry, 90(5), 3156–3164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04424
Huang, Y., Haseeb, M., Usman, M., & Ozturk, I. (2022). Dynamic association between ICT, renewable energy, economic complexity and ecological footprint: Is there any difference between E-7 (developing) and G-7 (developed) countries? Technology in Society, 68, 101853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101853
Ifinedo, E., & Kankaanranta, M. (2021). Understanding the influence of context in technology integration from teacher educators’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1867231
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
Kobayashi, H., Hayakawa, A., Somarathne, K. D. K. A., & Okafor, E. C. (2019). Science and technology of ammonia combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 37(1), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.09.029
Köttl, H., Tatzer, V. C., & Ayalon, L. (2022). COVID-19 and Everyday ICT Use: The Discursive Construction of Old Age in German Media. The Gerontologist, 62(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab126
MacLachlan, M., Banes, D., Bell, D., Borg, J., Donnelly, B., Fembek, M., Ghosh, R., Gowran, R. J., Hannay, E., Hiscock, D., Hoogerwerf, E.-J., Howe, T., Kohler, F., Layton, N., Long, S., Mannan, H., Mji, G., Odera Ongolo, T., Perry, K., … Hooks, H. (2018). Assistive technology policy: A position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 454–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496
March, H. (2018). The Smart City and other ICT-led techno-imaginaries: Any room for dialogue with Degrowth? Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1694–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.154
Merrick, B., & Joseph, D. (2022). ICT and music technology during COVID-19: Australian music educator perspectives. Research Studies in Music Education, 1321103X2210929. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X221092927
Murashima, M., Oyama, S., Kousaka, H., Tokoroyama, T., Lee, W.-Y., & Umehara, N. (2022). New in situ low-friction technology for diamond-like carbon coatings using surface discharge treatment in ambient air. Tribology International, 165, 107306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107306
Parker, M. W., Davis, C., White, K., Johnson, D., Golden, M., & Zola, S. (2022). Reduced care burden and improved quality of life in African American family caregivers: Positive impact of personalized assistive technology. Technology and Health Care, 30(2), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-213049
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
Saleh, Y. (2021). ICT, social media and COVID-19: Evidence from informal home-based business community in Kuwait City. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07-2020-0131
Singh, P., & Siddiqui, A. A. (2021). Innovation, ICT penetration, trade and economic growth in developing and developed countries: A VECM approach. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-05-2021-0074
Smith, R. O., Scherer, M. J., Cooper, R., Bell, D., Hobbs, D. A., Pettersson, C., Seymour, N., Borg, J., Johnson, M. J., Lane, J. P., Sujatha, S., Rao, P., Obiedat, Q. M., MacLachlan, M., & Bauer, S. (2018). Assistive technology products: A position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1473895
Taimalu, M., & Luik, P. (2019). The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among teacher educators: A path analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.012
von Humboldt, S., Mendoza-Ruvalcaba, N. Ma., Arias-Merino, E. D., Costa, A., Cabras, E., Low, G., & Leal, I. (2020). Smart technology and the meaning in life of older adults during the Covid-19 public health emergency period: A cross-cultural qualitative study. International Review of Psychiatry, 32(7–8), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2020.1810643
Woodley, F. W., Ciciora, S. L., Vaz, K., Williams, K., Di Lorenzo, C., & Jadcherla, S. (2020). Novel Use of Impedance Technology Shows That Esophageal Air Events Can Be Temporally Associated With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-like Symptoms. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, 70(1), e7–e11. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002514
Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B., & Flueggen, F. (2021). High school students’ experience of online learning during Covid-19: The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337
Al-Thani, S., Skelhorn, C., Amato, A., Koc, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. (2018). Smart Technology Impact on Neighborhood Form for a Sustainable Doha. Sustainability, 10(12), 4764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124764
Berry, N. S., & Maitra, R. (2019). TiK?means: Transformation?infused K ?means clustering for skewed groups. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, 12(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.11416
Bjørk, R. F., Bølstad, E., Pons, F., & Havighurst, S. S. (2022). Testing TIK (Tuning in to Kids) with TEC (Test of Emotion Comprehension): Does enhanced emotion socialization improve child emotion understanding? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 78, 101368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101368
Carvajal Bermúdez, J. C., & König, R. (2021). The role of technologies and citizen organizations in decentralized forms of participation. A case study about residential streets in Vienna. Technology in Society, 66, 101604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101604
Kostelanská, K., Kurhajec, S., Pavloková, S., Vetchý, D., Gajdziok, J., & Franc, A. (2022). Technology of Processing Plant Extracts Using an Aluminometasilicate Porous Carrier into a Solid Dosage Form. Pharmaceutics, 14(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020248
Lv, L., Zhao, J., Wang, J., & Fan, T. (2019). Multi-objective firefly algorithm based on compensation factor and elite learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.07.047
McPhail, G. (2018). Curriculum integration in the senior secondary school: A case study in a national assessment context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1386234
Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019). Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(44), 22071–22080. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900654116
Nnaji, C., & Karakhan, A. A. (2020). Technologies for safety and health management in construction: Current use, implementation benefits and limitations, and adoption barriers. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101212
Prendergast, M., & Treacy, P. (2018). Curriculum reform in Irish secondary schools – a focus on algebra. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1313315
Rice, J., & Martin, N. (2020). Smart infrastructure technologies: Crowdsourcing future development and benefits for Australian communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.027
Wang, X., Qiao, X., Mi, N., & Wang, R. (2019). Technologies for the benefit development of low-permeability tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Yan’an Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry B, 6(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2018.11.017
Yu, D., Hong, J., Zhang, J., & Niu, Q. (2018). Multi-Objective Individualized-Instruction Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 62, 288–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.056
Zhu, H., & Jin, Y. (2020). Multi-Objective Evolutionary Federated Learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 31(4), 1310–1322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2919699
Copyright (c) 2023 Arenaz Tania, Milton Alan, Xuemin Pik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
