Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Electronic Registration System in Resolving Property Disputes: Survey Research at the National Land Agency
Article Sidebar
-
Evaluation, Effectiveness, Electronic
Abstract
Background Electronic registration systems have become a significant innovation in modern property administration. In the context of the National Land Agency, the implementation of an electronic registration system aims to increase efficiency and transparency in resolving property disputes. However, the effectiveness of this system still needs to be thoroughly evaluated to ensure that these goals are achieved optimally.
The aim of the research is to evaluate the effectiveness of the electronic registration system implemented in resolving property disputes at the National Land Agency. By assessing the success of this system in facilitating the property dispute resolution process, the aim of this research is to provide in-depth insight into the extent to which this system can increase efficiency and transparency in the process.
The research method used is a survey involving relevant stakeholders in the property dispute resolution process at the National Land Agency. The survey will cover use of the electronic registration system, perceptions of the system's effectiveness, and feedback and suggestions for further improvement.
Research Results From the survey results, it can be concluded that the electronic registration system has made a positive contribution in increasing efficiency and transparency in resolving property disputes at the National Land Agency. The majority of respondents stated that this system speeds up the process, reduces administrative errors, and increases the accessibility of property-related information.
This research concludes that the electronic registration system is effective in resolving property disputes at the National Land Agency. However, there are several areas that still require improvements and updates to improve overall system performance. Thus, recommendations are given to continuously update the system in accordance with technological developments and user needs to ensure its effectiveness in the long term.
Full text article
References
Apriantoro, MS, Alis, MNI, Septianozakia, S., & Setiana, D. (2023). Comparing KHI and KHES in Marital Property Grant Disputes: An Analysis of Judges' Views. Al-Istinbath: Journal of Islamic Law, 8(1 May), 37.https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464
Bacior, S. (2023). Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland. Land Use Policy, 131, 106740.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106740
Barakat, M., Abdul-Malak, M.-AU, & Khoury, H. (2024). Simulated Effectiveness of Claims and Disputes Resolution Progression Using Agent-Based Modeling. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16(1), 04523038.https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1065
Ba?o?lu, Y.R. (2024). Aftereffects, High-Levelism and Gestalt Properties. Review of Philosophy and Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-024-00730-3
Bessy, C. (2024). Expropriation by Law: Intellectual Property, Value and Labor. Edward Elgar Publishing.https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035326150
Charters, B., Heffernan, T., & Daly, M. (2023). When individual action requires collective approval: A roadmap for solar power adoption by strata property owners. Journal of Social Marketing, 13(1), 100–120.https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-04-2022-0076
Chen, M., & Liu, Y. (2019). Study on the Patent Infringement Litigation and Patent Invalidation Trial Processes in the Biopharmaceutical Industry in China. Biotechnology Law Report, 38(5), 284–288.https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2019.29136.mc
Corbett, S. (2019). Re-conceptualizing the country code top level domain name as a sui generis intellectual property right. In S. Frankel (Ed.), Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Edward Elgar Publishing.https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977999.00014
Cornell, M., & Baron, T. (2023). The law and ethics of a property rights approach to frozen embryo disputes. Legal Studies, 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.33
Crawford, M. J. R. (2023). CONTRACT AS PROPERTY: TRIANGLES AND TRAGIC CHOICES. The Cambridge Law Journal, 82(1), 83–109.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197322000903
Dey, D. (2023). Technique as empowerment: Dispute resolution forums for older people in India. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 55(2), 158–179.https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2174296
Frantová, V. (2024). Public justifications in differentiated symbolic spheres: Czech restitution of church property. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2024.2338132
Ghosh, S., & Yamarik, S. (2019). Do the intellectual property rights of regional trading arrangements impact foreign direct investment? An empirical examination. International Review of Economics & Finance, 62, 180–195.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.03.002
Giustolisi, R., & Bruni, A. (2020). Privacy-Preserving Dispute Resolution in the Improved Bingo Voting. In R. Krimmer, M. Volkamer, B. Beckert, R. Küsters, O. Kulyk, D. Duenas-Cid, & M. Solvak (Eds.), Electronic Voting (Vol. 12455, pp. 67–83). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60347-2_5
Hartman, A.C., Blair, R.A., & Blattman, C. (2021). Engineering Informal Institutions: Long-Run Impacts of Alternative Dispute Resolution on Violence and Property Rights in Liberia. The Journal of Politics, 83(1), 381–389.https://doi.org/10.1086/709431
Heard, G., & Bickerdike, A. (2021). Dispute Resolution Choices for Property Settlement in A ustralia: Client Views on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Family Dispute Resolution and Legal Pathways. Family Court Review, 59(4), 790–809.https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12565
Hua, C., Wu, S., Zhang, Y., Luo, K., Li, M., & Fu, J. (2023). A Blockchain-Based Framework for Rural Property Rights Transactions. Electronics, 12(20), 4334.https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12204334
Johari, R. J. (2023). Intellectual Property in Malaysia: Initiatives, Challenges & Real Infringement Cases. Economic Affairs, 68(3).https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2023.16
Knoll AM, D.D. (2024). Quality standards for tribunal decision making in strata disputes. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, 16(1), 3–19.https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-05-2023-0027
Knott, C., Wiber, M. G., & Mather, C. (2024). Aquaculture's offshore frontier: Learning from the Canadian courts on ocean grabbing, ocean privatization, and property as process. Maritime Studies, 23(1), 5.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00348-8
Koumpli, V. (2023). Mediation in Cross-Border Matrimonial Property Disputes and Property Disputes of Registered Partners: Greek Law and Policy. In I. Kunda, Z. Meški?, E. Omerovi?, & DV Popovi? (Eds.), Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022 (Vol. 2022, pp. 113–134). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29432-7_6
Kucukali, C., Bukalerova, L.A., Naurzaliyeva, S.M., & Vasilenko, A.S. (2022). Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution in Intellectual Property Disputes in Turkey and Russian Federation. In EG Popkova & BS Sergi (Eds.), Geo-Economy of the Future (pp. 573–581). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92303-7_62
Ku?, B. (2021). Opodatkowanie nabycia nieruchomo?ci w drodze dzia?u spadku. Glosa do wyroku Naczelnego S?du Administracyjnego z dnia 13 pa?dziernika 2015 r. (II FSK 2133/13, LEX nr 1808541). Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 30(1), 415.https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.1.415-427
Mahrus, Moh. (2022). Settlement of Waqf Disputes and its Asset Protection in East Java, Indonesia. Mazahib, 20(2).https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i2.3833
Miao, M., Tang, D.Y., Xu, L.C., & Yan, X. (2024). Property rights, political connections, and corporate investment. Review of Finance, 28(2), 593–619.https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfad029
Mikhailova, E.V. (2023). Methods and forms of resolution of interstate disputes. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 3, 128.https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520024819-1
Mitchell, A.D., & Samlidis, T. (2021). THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE WTO TOBACCO PLAIN PACKAGING DISPUTES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH MEASURES. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 70(4), 1011–1027.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589321000312
Mohd Mydin, FH, Mikton, C., Choo, WY, Shanmugam, RH, Murray, A., Yon, Y., Mohd Yunus, R., Hairi, NN, Mohd Hairi, F., Beaulieu, M., & Phelan, A. (2023). PROTOCOL: Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring elder abuse and neglect in community and institutional settings: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(3), e1342.https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1342
Nguy?n, TTH (2023). Examining the Breadth and Conformity with Global Standards of Vietnamese Courts' Exclusive Jurisdiction in International Commercial Contracts Pertaining to Immovable Property Within Vietnam. Netherlands International Law Review, 70(3), 383–399.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-024-00249-5
Okur, I. (2023). Industrial Property Arbitration in Turkey: An Analysis in Comparison with Swiss Law. GRUR International, 72(3), 237–249.https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac151
Owusu-Ansah, A., Asante, L.A., & Abubakari, Z. (2024). The nexus between land title registration and property prices in Ghana: Evidence from Accra's housing market. Property Management, 42(1), 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-03-2023-0022
Poshnath, A., Rismanchi, B., & Rajabifard, A. (2023). Adoption of Renewable Energy Systems in common properties of multi-owned buildings: Introduction of 'Energy Entitlement.' Energy Policy, 174, 113465.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113465
Pra?mowska-Marcinowska, K. (2022). Repatriation of Indigenous Peoples' Cultural Property: Could Alternative Dispute Resolution Be a Solution? Lessons Learned from the G'psgolox Totem Pole and the Maaso Kova Case. Santander Arts and Culture Law Review, 8(2), 135–158.https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.22.015.17028
Sun, S.L., Choi, Y., Guo, F., Guo, J., Zou, B., & Cui, L. (2023). Winning intellectual property rights lawsuits in China. Journal of World Business, 58(3), 101429.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101429
Shaikhu, S. (2019). The Dispute Settlements of Inheritance in Palangka Raya: A Legal Anthropology Approach. Mazahib, 117–141.https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v18i1.1441
Tanwir SH, MH, Dr. RFM, & SH, M. Hum., M.Kn., DH (2019). ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES AS PART OF INVESTMENT IN THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY SECTOR UNDER INDONESIAN LAW. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 93–97.https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7512
Tanzi, A.M., & Mason, P.E. (2021). The Potential of the Singapore Convention on Mediation for Art and Cultural Property Disputes. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 12(4), 669–692.https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idab017
The Legal Regulation of the Use of Natural Healing Resources: The Theory and Practice of Disputes Resolution. (2021). Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(2), 144–163.https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-4.2-n000065
The School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society (EGIS), Heriot Watt University, Putrajaya, MALAYSIA, Khawaja, EUR, Department of Civil Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology (NEDUET), Karachi, Karachi City, Sindh, PAKISTAN, Mustapha, A., & The School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society (EGIS), Heriot Watt University, Putrajaya, MALAYSIA. (2021). Mitigating Disputes and Managing Legal Issues in the Era of Building Information Modeling. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 26(1), 111–130.https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2021.26.1.6
Tylec, G., & Kwiecie?, S. (2024). Judicial Cancellation of Commonality of Author's Economic Rights as the Proceedings Excluded from the Jurisdiction of the Intellectual Property Courts: Case Study. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 33(1), 343–358.https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.1.343-358
Wang, H., Li, L., Liu, B., Xu, H., & Jiang, C. (2022). Atomic-scale structure clarification of the planar Z phase and its influence on the magnetic properties in Sm(CoFeCuZr) permanent magnets. Acta Materialia, 230, 117846.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117846
Xiao, T., Li, P., Fei, W., & Wang, J. (2024). Effects of vegetation roots on the structure and hydraulic properties of soils: A perspective review. Science of the Total Environment, 906, 167524.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167524
Yu, Q. (2023). China National Intellectual Property Administration clarifies administrative adjudication measures for significant patent infringement disputes in pharmaceutical cases. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 18(2), 77–79.https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad006
Zhang, M., & Bjerke, L. (2023). Antibiotics “dumped”: Negotiating Pharmaceutical Identities, Properties, and Interests in China–India Trade Disputes. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 37(2), 148–163.https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12757
Zhou, L., Sukpasjaroen, K., Cai, E., Moonsri, K., Imsiri, P., & Chankoson, T. (2023). The psychometric properties of nursing image measurement instruments: A systematic review. Nursing Open, 10(8), 5056–5078.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1742
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Loso Judijanto, M. Indra Gunawan, Nuryati Salopari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
