Comparative Analysis of the Use of Customary Law in Land Dispute Resolution: Case Study Approach
Abstract
Background. Background Customary law is a legal system that has existed since ancient times in many communities in Indonesia. However, with modernization and globalization, the use of customary law in land dispute resolution is often overlooked or defeated by positive law. Therefore, it is important to conduct a comparative analysis of the use of customary law in land dispute resolution to understand its relevance in the context of modern law.
Purpose. The purpose of this study is to investigate the comparative use of customary law and positive law in land dispute resolution. The specific objective is to evaluate the effectiveness, fairness and sustainability of each approach in resolving land conflicts.
Method. The research method used is a case study approach. Case studies were conducted on several cases of land dispute resolution in various regions in Indonesia involving the use of customary law and positive law.
Results. The results show that the use of customary law in land dispute resolution often provides solutions that are more in line with local needs and traditional values of the community. However, positive law also has an important role in providing legal certainty and protection of individual rights.
Conclusion. Based on the results of the comparative analysis, it is concluded that both approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the integration between customary law and positive law can be a more optimal solution in resolving land disputes in Indonesia, by taking into account the local context and individual rights in a balanced manner.
Full text article
References
Afrizal, Elfitra, & Zuldesni. (2023). Analysing the effectiveness of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil’s Free, Prior and Informed Consent policy to respect customary land rights. Journal of International Development, 35(5), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3700
Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of The Total Environment, 685, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139
Angga, L. O., & Latupono, B. (2020). Application of Hawear Customary Law in the Prevention of Pollution and Environmental Damage on the Sea Coast in Southeast Maluku Regency. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(5), 767–744. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.150519
Antunes, A. P., Rebêlo, G. H., Pezzuti, J. C. B., Vieira, M. A. R. D. M., Constantino, P. D. A. L., Campos-Silva, J. V., Fonseca, R., Durigan, C. C., Ramos, R. M., Amaral, J. V. D., Camps Pimenta, N., Ranzi, T. J. D., Lima, N. A. S., & Shepard, G. H. (2019). A conspiracy of silence: Subsistence hunting rights in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 84, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.045
Asaaga, F. A. (2021). Building on “Traditional” Land Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Rural Ghana: Adaptive or Anachronistic? Land, 10(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020143
Bae, Y.-J. (2021). Analyzing the Changes of the Meaning of Customary Land in the Context of Land Grabbing in Malawi. Land, 10(8), 836. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080836
Barbosa Jr., R., & Burns, R. (2021). A community farm maps back! Disputes over public urban farmland in Calgary, Alberta. Journal of Maps, 17(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2020.1805806
Barinov, E. E., Markina, E. V., Pozdnyshov, A. N., & Tkachenko, M. A. (2021). Actual Problems of Development of the Legal Mechanism for Ensuring National Security of the Russian Federation. In E. G. Popkova & B. S. Sergi (Eds.), Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap (Vol. 198, pp. 1742–1749). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_193
Bedner, A., & Arizona, Y. (2019). Adat in Indonesian Land Law: A Promise for the Future or a Dead End? The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246
Beji, R., Yousfi, O., Loukil, N., & Omri, A. (2021). Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(1), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04522-4
Bentéjac, C., Csörg?, A., & Martínez-Muñoz, G. (2021). A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(3), 1937–1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09896-5
Cameron, L., Courchene, D., Ijaz, S., & Mauro, I. (2021). ‘A change of heart’: Indigenous perspectives from the Onjisay Aki Summit on climate change. Climatic Change, 164(3–4), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03000-8
Chachko, E., & Heath, J. B. (2022). A Watershed Moment for Sanctions? Russia, Ukraine, and the Economic Battlefield. AJIL Unbound, 116, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2022.21
Chauvin, S., Salcedo Robledo, M., Koren, T., & Illidge, J. (2021). Class, mobility and inequality in the lives of same-sex couples with mixed legal statuses. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(2), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625137
DeVito, N. J., Bacon, S., & Goldacre, B. (2020). Compliance with legal requirement to report clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort study. The Lancet, 395(10221), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33220-9
Dodge, W. S. (2021). A Modest Approach to the Customary International Law of Jurisdiction. European Journal of International Law, 32(4), 1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab093
Engberg, J. (2020). Comparative Law for Legal Translation: Through Multiple Perspectives to Multidimensional Knowledge. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 33(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09706-9
Gachenga, E. (2021). Climate Change Governance: Customary Law and Rural Women. In J. M. Luetz & D. Ayal (Eds.), Handbook of Climate Change Management (pp. 1639–1669). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_335
Geyer, H. S. (2023). Conflicts and synergies between customary land use management and urban planning in informal settlements. Land Use Policy, 125, 106459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106459
Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka Nishiku Fukuoka, Japan 819-0395, Budiman, I., Fujiwara, T., Sato, N., & Pamungkas, D. (2020). Another Law in Indonesia: Customary Land Tenure System Coexisting with State Order in Mutis Forest. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management), 26(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.26.3.244
Gutierrez-Giles, A., Evangelista-Hernandez, L. U., Arteaga, M. A., Cruz-Villar, C. A., & Rodriguez-Angeles, A. (2021). A Force/Motion Control Approach Based on Trajectory Planning for Industrial Robots With Closed Control Architecture. IEEE Access, 9, 80728–80740. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085528
Haji Munir, Z. A. (2022). Analysis of Patterns for Inheritance Dispute Settlement in the Tradition of Sasak Community in Lombok. Mazahib, 20(2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i2.3774
Hanesworth, P., Bracken, S., & Elkington, S. (2019). A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: Learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1465405
Havard, T. E., & Lefevre, M. (2020). Beyond the Power and Control Wheel: How abusive men manipulate mobile phone technologies to facilitate coercive control. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 4(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868020X15850131608789
He, X., Sinan, M., Kwak, H., & Hoteit, H. (2021). A corrected cubic law for single-phase laminar flow through rough-walled fractures. Advances in Water Resources, 154, 103984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103984
Ismi, H., Hasanah, U., & Sukma, S. (2021). Management Fisheries Resources Based on Customary Law as an Effort to Maintain River Sustainability in Lubuk Siam Village, Kampar, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 934(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/934/1/012045
Jany, J. (2020). Complementary Customary Law. In J. Jany, Legal Traditions in Asia (Vol. 80, pp. 447–452). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2_15
Liu, J. (2019). China’s renewable energy law and policy: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 99, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.007
Mensah, I. A., Sun, M., Gao, C., Omari-Sasu, A. Y., Zhu, D., Ampimah, B. C., & Quarcoo, A. (2019). Analysis on the nexus of economic growth, fossil fuel energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil price in Africa based on a PMG panel ARDL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.281
Mosquera Valderrama, I. J. (2020). BEPS principal purpose test and customary international law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 33(3), 745–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000278
Muhammad Mutawali. (2022). Customary Law of Dou Donggo Bima from the Perspective of Islamic and Indonesian Positive Law. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v17i1.6007
Njelesani, J. (2019). “A child who is hidden has no rights”: Responses to violence against children with disabilities. Child Abuse & Neglect, 89, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.024
Rana, N. P., Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., Islam, R., Roderick, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9873-4
Riley, M., Prenzler, T., & McKillop, N. (2020). Alternative dispute resolution and mediation of complaints against police in Australia and New Zealand. Police Practice and Research, 21(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2018.1500284
Sabarianand, D. V., Karthikeyan, P., & Muthuramalingam, T. (2020). A review on control strategies for compensation of hysteresis and creep on piezoelectric actuators based micro systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 140, 106634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106634
Shao, H., Yang, J., Xue, D., & 1 College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 1000812 Key Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China, National Ethnic Affairs Commission, Beijing 100081. (2021). Applications of Wa traditional culture in biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity Science, 29(8), 1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2020480
Siauve, N., Hayot, P. H., Deloison, B., Chalouhi, G. E., Alison, M., Balvay, D., Bussières, L., Clément, O., & Salomon, L. J. (2019). Assessment of human placental perfusion by intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 32(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1378334
Silberg, J., & Dallam, S. (2019). Abusers gaining custody in family courts: A case series of over turned decisions. Journal of Child Custody, 16(2), 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2019.1613204
Skelton, A., & Batley, M. (2021). A Comparative Review of the Incorporation of African traditional justice processes in Restorative Child Justice Systems in Uganda, Lesotho and Eswatini. In T. Gavrielides (Ed.), Comparative Restorative Justice (pp. 245–264). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74874-6_12
Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). Deliberative emotional talk. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09304-3
Tchatchoua?Djomo, R., Van Leeuwen, M., & Van Der Haar, G. (2020). Defusing Land Disputes? The Politics of Land Certification and Dispute Resolution in Burundi. Development and Change, 51(6), 1454–1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12621
Too, E. C., Yujian, L., Njuki, S., & Yingchun, L. (2019). A comparative study of fine-tuning deep learning models for plant disease identification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 161, 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.03.032
Von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2019). Anachronism, Agency, and the Contextualisation of Adat: Van Vollenhoven’s Analyses in Light of Struggles Over Resources. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670242
Wane, N. N., Karanja, W., & Anthony, H. M. (2020). A Gendered Analysis of Indigenous Knowledge, Customary Law and Education in Africa: An Anti-colonial Project. In J. M. Abidogun & T. Falola (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of African Education and Indigenous Knowledge (pp. 737–760). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38277-3_36
Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., & Liang, J. (2020). A New Reaching Law for Antidisturbance Sliding-Mode Control of PMSM Speed Regulation System. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 35(4), 4117–4126. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2019.2933613
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Loso Judijanto, Andrew Shandy Utama, Abdul Sahib, M. Ibnu Sumarna, Muh. Reza Zulfikar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.