Effectiveness of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System
Article Sidebar
-
Juvenile Justice, Restorative Justice, Victim Satisfaction
Abstract
Background: The juvenile criminal justice system has evolved to incorporate restorative justice (RJ) practices, which emphasize repairing harm and rehabilitating offenders through dialogue and reconciliation. The implementation of RJ in juvenile justice systems aims to provide an alternative to punitive measures and encourage offenders to take responsibility for their actions while addressing the needs of victims and communities. Despite its promise, the effectiveness of RJ in reducing recidivism and promoting positive outcomes for juvenile offenders remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of restorative justice practices in the juvenile criminal justice system, focusing on recidivism rates, victim satisfaction, and the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. The research seeks to assess whether RJ methods contribute to better long-term outcomes compared to traditional punitive approaches.
Method: A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative analysis of recidivism rates and qualitative interviews with juvenile offenders, victims, and justice system professionals involved in RJ programs.
Results: The findings show that restorative justice significantly reduces recidivism rates and improves victim satisfaction. Juvenile offenders reported feeling more accountable for their actions, and communities experienced a greater sense of justice and restoration.
Conclusion: Restorative justice practices prove to be effective in the juvenile criminal justice system, offering promising alternatives to traditional punitive methods. Policymakers should consider expanding RJ programs to further enhance rehabilitation and community healing.
Full text article
References
Aprilianda, N., & Maharani, F. (2024). Excusing Child Offenders: A Victim Justice Perspective. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 32(2), 433–452. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v32i2.33937
Banjarani, D. R., Del Rosario, M. S., & Novianti, V. (2023). Enhancing Restorative Justice in Indonesia: Exploring Diversion Implementation for Effective Juvenile Delinquency Settlement. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(2), 318–334. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2427.pp318-334
Battjes, K., & Kaplan, L. Z. (2023). Zero Tolerance vs Restorative Justice in the United States. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 13(4), 185–203. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1414
Beckman, K. J., Jewett, P. I., Ga?ad, A., & Borowsky, I. W. (2024). Reducing Re-arrest Through Community-Led, Police-Initiated Restorative Justice Diversion Tailored for Youth. Crime and Delinquency, 70(10), 2780–2802. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287231158569
Bonett, R., Lloyd, C. D., Stone, A. G., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2025). Group Conferencing is Associated with Lower Rates of Repeated Recidivism Among Higher-Risk Youth and There are Enhanced Effects Based on Who Attended the Conference. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 23(1), 72–93. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040241258952
Brooks, T. (2023). Juvenile offending. Dalam Juv. Offending (hlm. 324). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003424086
Calais-Ferreira, L., Young, J. T., Francis, K., Willoughby, M., Pearce, L., Clough, A., Spittal, M. J., Brown, A., Borschmann, R., Sawyer, S. M., Patton, G. C., & Kinner, S. A. (2023). Non-communicable disease mortality in young people with a history of contact with the youth justice system in Queensland, Australia: A retrospective, population-based cohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 8(8), e600–e609. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00144-5
Cheng, R. H.-H., & Rossner, M. (2023). Unpacking Shame and Confucian Relationalism in Taiwanese Restorative Justice. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 209–230. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09392-5
Colás Turégano, M. A. (2023). Punitivism and juvenile justice: The reform of the Law Regulating the Criminal Responsibility of Minors (LO 5/2000) by the “only yes is yes” law (LO 10/2022 on Integral Guarantee of Sexual Freedom). Revista Electronica de Ciencia Penal y Criminologia, 25. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85192230472&partnerID=40&md5=da776f04a5f5d1dcdc3b0483b23f64ef
de Lamare, B. J., & Costa, A. P. M. (2024). RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN JUVENILE CRIMINAL LAW AND THE REINTERPRETATION OF THE SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL PRINCIPLE. Novos Estudos Juridicos, 29(2), 352–372. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v29n2.p352-372
Filippi, J. (2023). Restorative justice for young offenders: A difficult “right” to access. Criminologie, 56(1), 361–383. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7202/1099017ar
Gaby, S., & Magnus, A. M. (2024). Teen Courts as Alternative Justice? Teens’ Carceral Habitus and the Reproduction of Social Inequality. Critical Criminology, 32(1), 41–59. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-023-09729-1
Gal, T., & Moyal, S. (2023). Juvenile victims in restorative justice: Findings front the reintegrative shaming experiments. Dalam Juv. Offending (hlm. 277–297). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85161202523&partnerID=40&md5=b71861e7649cedba9736d400e6209782
Huang, L., Sheu, C.-J., Lu, Y.-F., Yu, Y.-C., & Umbreit, M. S. (2023). Restorative Justice (XIU-FU-SHI-SI-FA) in Taiwan: Traditional Practices and Modern Developments. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 189–208. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09377-4
Ivashkevich, O. (2024). Toward an Anticarceral Art Pedagogy: Youth Poetic Media Making for Transformative Justice. Studies in Art Education, 65(4), 468–487. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2024.2390781
Kimbrell, C. S., Wilson, D. B., & Olaghere, A. (2023). Restorative justice programs and practices in juvenile justice: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis for effectiveness. Criminology and Public Policy, 22(1), 161–195. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12613
Koza, M., Kokkalera, S. S., & Navarro, J. C. (2024). The promise of alternatives for youths: An analysis of restorative justice practices in the United States. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 75(3), 23–36. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12268
Kratcoski, P. C. (2023). Trends in juvenile justice administration. Dalam Juvenile Justice Adm.: Processes and Issues (hlm. 265–284). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19515-0_13
Muchtar, S., Yunus, A., Arifin, A. P., & Faried, M. (2024). Juvenile Criminal Responsibility in Justice Systems: A Comparative Study of Judicial Interpretations in Indonesia and Australia. Jambe Law Journal, 7(2), 371–394. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.387
O’Mahony, D., & Doak, J. (2023). Restorative justice—Is more better? The experience of police-led restorative cautioning pilots in Northern Ireland. Dalam Juv. Offending (hlm. 255–276). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85161232719&partnerID=40&md5=fe2d0a163899ada590c041e95df59eeb
Perrella, L., Lodi, E., Lepri, G. L., & Patrizi, P. (2024). Use of restorative justice and restorative practices in prison: A systematic literature review. Rassegna Italiana Di Criminologia, 18(1), 69–82. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7347/RIC-012024-p69
Pramesti Putri, D. D. (2023). Sounding the Justice for Child: Does Restorative Justice Matters? Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(3), 302–323. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i3.68106
Ricciardi, F. (2024). Evaluate, design, implement. The punitive-re-educational paths of the juvenile penal system between restorative justice and the third sector. Archivio Antropologico Mediterraneo, 26(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4000/11t6q
Rizanizarli, R., Mahfud, M., Pratama, R. C., & Fikri, F. (2023). The Application of Restorative Justice for Children as Criminal Offenders in the Perspective of National Law and Qanun Jin?yat. Samarah, 7(1), 21–39. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.15633
Scholl, M. B., & Townsend, C. B. (2024). Restorative justice: A humanistic paradigm for addressing the needs of victims, offenders, and communities. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 63(3), 184–200. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/johc.12204
Stuart McQueen, S., Huguley, J. P., Haynik, R., Joseph-McCatty, A., Calaman, R., Williams, M., & Wang, M.-T. (2024). Teacher Perspectives on Effective Restorative Practice Implementation: Identifying Programmatic Elements that Promote Positive Relational Development in Schools. Child and Youth Services, 45(3), 430–457. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2023.2191943
Suzuki, M. (2025). Offender Journeys in Restorative Youth Justice Conferencing: The Overlap Between Restorative Justice and Desistance. Deviant Behavior, 46(4), 435–455. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2024.2352047
VanderPyl, T. (2023). Restorative justice in rural schools: The transformative power of rural educators. Dalam Expand. The Vision of Rurality in the US Educat. System (hlm. 168–186). IGI Global; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7437-2.ch009
Vásquez, H. T., & Acero, M. T. (2023). Sanctions in the Adolescent Criminal Responsibility System in Colombia. Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova, 21(41), 131–148. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.1001
Vicuña Pozo, V. E., Quintero Cepeda, D. E., & Borja Chiriboga, I. A. (2023). Restorative justice and its impact on juvenile offenders. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia - Serie de Conferencias, 2. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20231056
Wong, D. S. W., & Fung, C. S. Y. (2023). Juvenile Community Corrections in China: The Quest for a Restorative Approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 113–132. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09381-8
Wu, Z., & Wu, S. (2023). The Past, Present, and Future of Restorative Justice in the Chinese Mainland: A Systematic Review of Chinese Literature. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 89–112. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-023-09400-2
Yates, P., & Allardyce, S. (2023). “In there but not in there”: Sibling sexual abuse as a disruptor in the field of child sexual abuse. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 29(3), 440–449. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2023.2225547
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Henny Saida Flora, Harmono Harmono, Livia Alves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
