Critique of the Neoclassical Economic Model from an Islamic Economic Perspective
Article Sidebar
-
Economic Distribution, Islamic Economics, Social Justice
Abstract
For many years, the neoclassical economic model has been the basis of modern economic analysis. This model is based on the assumptions of individual rationality, market equilibrium, and resource allocation based on market prices. This study examines and evaluates the neoclassical economic model from an Islamic economic perspective. Specifically, it seeks a deeper understanding of how Islamic economic principles and values can offer alternatives or adjustments to the currently dominant neoclassical model. Using a qualitative approach, this study analyzes relevant literature on Islamic and neoclassical economics. In addition, this study involves a comparative study of the basic principles of both paradigms; in addition, this study explores the theoretical and practical perspectives offered by Islamic economists. This study shows that the criticism of the neoclassical economic model from the perspective of Islamic economics has a strong and reasonable basis. Social justice and fair distribution in the distribution of resources are often overlooked by the neoclassical economic model. In conclusion, this study shows that there is great potential to create a more inclusive and sustainable economic model by combining Islamic economic principles with the neoclassical economic framework. Although there are fundamental differences between the two paradigms, incorporating Islamic economic principles in a judicious manner can result in a more equitable and effective economic system.
Full text article
References
Adams, E.C. (2019). Economics and the civic mission of social studies education: Two critiques of neoclassicism. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 18(1), 16–32.https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173419841915
Adejumo, O.O. (2020). Environmental quality vs economic growth in a developing economy: Complements or conflicts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(6), 6163–6179.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07101-x
Agenjo?Calderón, A., & Gálvez?Muñoz, L. (2019). Feminist Economics: Theoretical and Political Dimensions. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 137–166.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12264
Allan, B.B. (2019). Paradigm and nexus: Neoclassical economics and the growth imperative in the World Bank, 1948–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 26(1), 183–206.https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1543719
Angner, E. (2019). We're all behavioral economists now. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(3), 195–207.https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625210
Arthur, WB (2021). Foundations of economic complexity. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(2), 136–145.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00273-3
Becchio, G. (2019). A History of Feminist and Gender Economics (1st ed.). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102559
Berndt, C., & Wirth, M. (2019). Struggling for the Moral Market: Economic Knowledge, Diverse Markets, and Market Borders. Economic Geography, 95(3), 288–309.https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1521699
Boyd, C. M., & Bellemare, M. F. (2020). The Microeconomics of Agricultural Price Risk. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 149–169.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093807
Brand-Correa, L., Brook, A., Büchs, M., Meier, P., Naik, Y., & O'Neill, D. W. (2022). Economics for people and planet—Moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(4), e371–e379.https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00063-8
Burnham, T. C., & Phelan, J. (2020). Ordinaries: Strangers in a strange land: mismatch and economics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 22(1), 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-020-09294-5
Chadwick, S. (2022). From utilitarianism and neoclassical sport management to a new geopolitical economy of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 22(5), 685–704.https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2032251
Cincotti, S., Raberto, M., & Teglio, A. (2022). Why do we need agent-based macroeconomics? Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 3(1), 5–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-022-00071-w
Clark, C. M. A. (2019). Catholicism and Economics: Towards a “Deeper Reflection on the Nature of the Economy and its Purposes.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(2), 409–441.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12273
Desai, R. (2020). Marx's critical political economy, 'Marxist economics' and actually occurring revolutions against capitalism. Third World Quarterly, 41(8), 1353–1370.https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1741346
Feuerbacher, A., Laub, M., Högy, P., Lippert, C., Pataczek, L., Schindele, S., Wieck, C., & Zikeli, S. (2021). An analytical framework to estimate the economics and adoption potential of dual land-use systems: The case of agrivoltaics. Agricultural Systems, 192, 103193.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103193
Galbraith, J. K. (2021). Economics and the climate catastrophe. Globalizations, 18(7), 1117–1122.https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807858
Galvin, R., & Healy, N. (2020). The Green New Deal in the United States: What it is and how to pay for it. Energy Research & Social Science, 67, 101529.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101529
Giudici, G., Milne, A., & Vinogradov, D. (2020). Cryptocurrencies: Market analysis and perspectives. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 47(1), 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00138-6
Hu, M. (2021). From the Classics to New Tunes: A Neoclassical View on Sharing Economy and Innovative Marketplaces. Production and Operations Management, 30(6), 1668–1685.https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13330
Jakob, M., Lamb, W.F., Steckel, J.C., Flachsland, C., & Edenhofer, O. (2020). Understanding different perspectives on economic growth and climate policy. WIREs Climate Change, 11(6), e677.https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.677
Keen, S. (2021). The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change. Globalizations, 18(7), 1149–1177.https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807856
Lewis, P., & Dold, M. (2020). James Buchanan on the nature of choice: Ontology, artifactual man and the constitutional moment in political economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(5), 1159–1179.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaa027
Lin, J. Y. (2021). New structural economics: A framework of studying government and economics. Journal of Government and Economics, 2, 100014.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2021.100014
Makhlouf, R. (2020). Cloudy transaction costs: A dive into cloud computing economics. Journal of Cloud Computing, 9(1), 1.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-019-0149-4
Massenberg, J.R. (2019). Social values and sustainability: A retrospective view on the contribution of economics. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1233–1246.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00693-w
Meyer, B., & Ahlert, G. (2019). Imperfect Markets and the Properties of Macro-economic-environmental Models as Tools for Policy Evaluation. Ecological Economics, 155, 80–87.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.017
Pasinetti, L.L. (2019). Causality and interdependence in econometric analysis and in economic theory. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 49, 357–363.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.09.008
Pirgmaier, E. (2021). The value of value theory for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 179, 106790.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106790
Pirgmaier, E., & Steinberger, J. K. (2019). Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Traveled for Ecological Economics. Sustainability, 11(7), 2001.https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072001
Racko, G. (2019). The Values of Economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 35–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3442-5
Rahman, MM, Saidi, K., & Mbarek, MB (2020). Economic growth in South Asia: The role of CO2 emissions, population density and trade openness. Heliyon, 6(5), e03903.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03903
Roncaglia, A. (2019). The Age of Fragmentation: A History of Contemporary Economic Thought (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108777766
Scheidegger, S., & Billionis, I. (2019). Machine learning for high-dimensional dynamic stochastic economies. Journal of Computational Science, 33, 68–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2019.03.004
Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Fleurbaey, M. (2020). TAXATION OF ECONOMIC RENTS. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(2), 398–423.https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12340
Shanks, N. (2019). Against 'economic man': A feminist challenge to prevailing neoclassical norms in K-12 economics education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(4), 577–603.https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1647904
Slade-Caffarel, Y. (2019). The nature of heterodox economics revisited. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(3), 527–539.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey043
Spash, C. L. (2020). A tale of three paradigms: Realizing the revolutionary potential of ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 169, 106518.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518
Spash, C. L., & Hache, F. (2022). The Dasgupta Review deconstructed: An exposé of biodiversity economics. Globalizations, 19(5), 653–676.https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1929007
Stead, J. G., & Stead, W. E. (2019). Why Porter Is Not Enough: Economic Foundations of Sustainable Strategic Management. In T. Wunder (Ed.), Rethinking Strategic Management (pp. 67–85). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06014-5_4
Stilwell, F. (2019). From Economics to Political Economy: Contradictions, Challenges, and Change. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 35–62.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12259
Urbina, D. A., & Ruiz?Villaverde, A. (2019). A Critical Review of Homo Economicus from Five Approaches. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 63–93.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12258
Waddock, S. (2020). Reframing and Transforming Economics around Life. Sustainability, 12(18), 7553.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187553
Washington, H., & Maloney, M. (2020). The need for ecological ethics in a new ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 169, 106478.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106478
Westgren, R., & Wuebker, R. (2019). An economic model of strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(4), 507–528.https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1319
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Syamsu Rijal, Murphy Xavier, McCarty Elliot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
