Arbitration in Agreement Dispute (Perspective of Law Number 30 Year 1999)
Abstract
Background. In business relations between the parties in the development does not rule out the possibility of problems that require solutions.
Purpose. This research aims to find out the process of resolving civil disputes through the Aribitrase court based on Law Number 30 of 1999
Method. The method in this research uses a normative juridical approach, which means that a study is carried out based on laws and judicial decisions that have permanent legal force. In the collection of legal materials using two ways, namely literature research by reviewing the literature and opinions of legal experts related to research problems.
Results. The results of the research can be concluded that the arbitration agreement cannot stand and cannot bind the parties if the arbitration agreement does not coincide with the main agreement, which will be handled by the arbitration agreement is regarding disputes arising from the main agreement, so a civil dispute can be submitted for resolution through the arbitration court if it meets the subjective and objective requirements in the Basic Agreement (JOC). the parties agree that if there is a civil dispute it will be resolved through arbitration.
Conclusion. The Arbitration institution has a binding nature on the parties and is final in the sense that the parties cannot appeal to the general court after the Arbitration decision.
Full text article
References
Abdul Muthalib, S., M. Jakfar, T., Maulana, M., & Hakim, L. (2021). Changes in Congregational Prayer Practices During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Aceh from Maqashid al-Sharia Perspective. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 16(2), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i2.5250
Aguirre, E. (2019). Do changes in divorce legislation have an impact on divorce rates? The case of unilateral divorce in Mexico. Latin American Economic Review, 28(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40503-019-0071-7
Agustanti, A., & Astuti, K. (2022). Relationship Between Social Skills and Social Support with Peers’ Academic Confidence on Boarding High School Students. Journal International Dakwah and Communication, 2(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.55849/jidc.v2i2.201
Ardiansyah Rakhmadi, A. R. (2022). Measuring Shar??ah Compliance Model: Evidence from Islamic Banks in Indonesia. journal of king Abdulaziz University Islamic Economics, 35(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.4197/Islec.35-1.2
Asman, A., & Muchsin, T. (2021). Maqasid al-Shari’ah in Islamic Law Renewal: The Impact of New Normal Rules on Islamic Law Practices during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Mazahib, 77–102. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i1.2957
Boute, A. (2020). Regulatory stability and renewable energy investment: The case of Kazakhstan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 121, 109673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109673
Bussières, A., Hartvigsen, J., Ferreira, M. L., Ferreira, P. H., Hancock, M. J., Stone, L. S., Wideman, T. H., Boruff, J., & Elklit, A. (2020). Adverse childhood experience and adult persistent pain and disability: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 215. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01474-8
Chouksey, A., & Pandey, S. (2020). Functional Movement Disorders in Children. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 570151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.570151
Existence of Cointegration between the Public and Private Bank Index: Evidence from Indian Capital Market. (2021). Advances in Decision Sciences, 25(4), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.47654/v25y2021i4p152-172
Groc, L., & Choquet, D. (2020). Linking glutamate receptor movements and synapse function. Science, 368(6496), eaay4631. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4631
Hansen, S. (2019). Challenging Arbitral Awards in the Construction Industry: Case Study of Infrastructure Disputes. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(1), 06518004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000281
He, R.-Z., Luo, D.-X., & Mo, Y.-Y. (2019). Emerging roles of lncRNAs in the post-transcriptional regulation in cancer. Genes & Diseases, 6(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2019.01.003
Jagannathan, M., & Delhi, V. S. K. (2019). Litigation Proneness of Dispute Resolution Clauses in Construction Contracts. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(3), 04519011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000301
Kourouxous, T., & Bauer, T. (2019). Violations of dominance in decision-making. Business Research, 12(1), 209–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7
Lubit, R. (2019). Valid and invalid ways to assess the reason a child rejects a parent: The continued malignant role of “parental alienation syndrome.” Journal of Child Custody, 16(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2019.1590284
Moen, E., Bannon, D., Kudo, T., Graf, W., Covert, M., & Van Valen, D. (2019). Deep learning for cellular image analysis. Nature Methods, 16(12), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0403-1
Mukhibad, H., Setiawan, D., Rahmawati, N. A., Rochmatullah, M. R., & Warsina, N. A. (2022). Sharia supervisory board, maqasid syariah, and accounting-based performance: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 15(3), 213. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEF.2022.126902
Mulizar, M., Asmuni, A., & Tanjung, D. (2022). Maqashid Sharia Perspective of Legal Sanction for Khalwat Actors in Aceh. Al-Istinbath?: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.3587
O’Cathain, A., Croot, L., Duncan, E., Rousseau, N., Sworn, K., Turner, K. M., Yardley, L., & Hoddinott, P. (2019). Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open, 9(8), e029954. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954
O’Toole, Á., Scher, E., Underwood, A., Jackson, B., Hill, V., McCrone, J. T., Colquhoun, R., Ruis, C., Abu-Dahab, K., Taylor, B., Yeats, C., Du Plessis, L., Maloney, D., Medd, N., Attwood, S. W., Aanensen, D. M., Holmes, E. C., Pybus, O. G., & Rambaut, A. (2021). Assignment of epidemiological lineages in an emerging pandemic using the pangolin tool. Virus Evolution, 7(2), veab064. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veab064
Prescott, C., & Rasmussen, J. M. (2020). Exploring the “Cozy Cabal of Academics, Dealers and Collectors” through the Schøyen Collection. Heritage, 3(1), 68–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3010005
Schwartz, D. A., & Graham, A. L. (2020). Potential Maternal and Infant Outcomes from Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (SARS-CoV-2) Infecting Pregnant Women: Lessons from SARS, MERS, and Other Human Coronavirus Infections. Viruses, 12(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12020194
Stef, N., & Zenou, E. (2021). Management-to-staff ratio and a firm’s exit. Journal of Business Research, 125, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.027
Taufik, M., Muhammad, R., & Nugraheni, P. (2023). Determinants and consequences of maqashid sharia performance: Evidence from Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2021-0205
V’kovski, P., Gerber, M., Kelly, J., Pfaender, S., Ebert, N., Braga Lagache, S., Simillion, C., Portmann, J., Stalder, H., Gaschen, V., Bruggmann, R., Stoffel, M. H., Heller, M., Dijkman, R., & Thiel, V. (2019). Determination of host proteins composing the microenvironment of coronavirus replicase complexes by proximity-labeling. ELife, 8, e42037. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42037
Wang, H., Kulas, J. A., Wang, C., Holtzman, D. M., Ferris, H. A., & Hansen, S. B. (2021). Regulation of beta-amyloid production in neurons by astrocyte-derived cholesterol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(33), e2102191118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102191118
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 Rahmat Ihya, Abdul Qudus Salam, Muh Bangsu, Rohman Hakim, Hermawan Hermawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.