Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights in the Digital Era
Article Sidebar
-
Constitutional Rights, Digital Era, Legal Frameworks
Abstract
Background: The digital era has brought about significant advancements in technology, leading to an increased reliance on digital platforms for communication, transactions, and daily activities. While these technological advancements provide numerous benefits, they also raise concerns about the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights, particularly in terms of privacy, freedom of expression, and data security. Governments and legal systems face the challenge of ensuring that constitutional rights are upheld in an increasingly digital society, where the lines between public and private spheres are often blurred.
Objective: This study aims to examine the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights in the digital era, focusing on the balance between technological innovation and individual rights. The research seeks to assess the effectiveness of existing legal frameworks in safeguarding privacy, freedom of speech, and other fundamental rights in the context of the digital landscape.
Method: A qualitative research design was used, employing case studies, legal analysis, and interviews with legal professionals, policymakers, and technology experts. The data collected was analyzed to evaluate how well constitutional rights are protected in digital environments and to identify potential gaps in legal protection.
Results: The findings indicate that while there are legal frameworks in place to protect constitutional rights, there are significant challenges in keeping pace with technological advancements. Privacy violations, surveillance concerns, and data breaches were highlighted as key issues.
Conclusion: The study concludes that existing legal protections must be adapted to address the challenges posed by the digital era, with a focus on strengthening privacy laws, improving data security, and ensuring accountability in digital platforms.
Full text article
References
Alvares, C., Cardoso, G., Crespo, M., & Pinto-Martinho, A. (2023). Seeking the Legitimation of Mainstream Journalism: A Portuguese Case-Study. Journalism Practice, 17(8), 1662–1677. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2008808
Austin, L. M., & Slane, A. (2023). Digitally rethinking hunter v southam. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 60(2), 419–472. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3895
Beiter, K. D., Flynn, S., Forere, M., Klaaren, J., Ncube, C. B., Nwauche, E. S., Rens, A., Samtani, S., & Schonwetter, T. (2022). Copyright Reform in South Africa: Two Joint Academic Opinions on the Copyright Amendment Bill [B13B-2017]. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 25. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a13880
Benlloch Domènech, C., & Sarrión Esteve, J. (2022). Fundamental rights and aporias of the digital age. Cuestiones Constitucionales, 46, 3–28. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2022.46.17046
Berezko, V. E. (2020). Legal Liberalism and the Digital Economy: Boundaries of Freedom in a New Era. Dalam Popkova E.G., Sergi B.S., & Sergi B.S. (Ed.), Lect. Notes Networks Syst.: Vol. 129 LNNS (hlm. 449–458). Springer; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47945-9_50
Caruso, C. (2024). Towards the Institutions of Freedom: The European Public Discourse in the Digital Era. German Law Journal. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.68
De Gregorio, G., & Radu, R. (2022). Digital constitutionalism in the new era of Internet governance. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(1), 68–87. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac004
Fikri, M. (2024). CANCEL CULTURE: ISLAMIC LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY CHALLENGES IN THE DIGITAL AGE. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 18(8). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-007
Fuller, G. P., & Desgualdo, J. L. M. N. G. (2021). Homelessness in the digital age in the face of the covid-19 pandemic. Revista Juridica, 2(64), 540–564. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21902/revistajur.2316-753X.v2i64.5194
Glennon, M. J. (2023). Free speech and turbulent freedom: The dangerous allure of censorship in the digital era. Dalam Free speech and turbul. Freedom: The danger. Allure of censorsh. In the digit. Era (hlm. 278). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197636763.001.0001
Hamid, I., Hariyanto, I., & Putrawan, A. D. (2025). Cancel Culture: Legal And Public Policy Challenges in The Digital Age. Sociologia y Tecnociencia, 15(1), 154–175. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2025.154-175
Kosarin, S. P., Tereliansky, P. V., & Titor, S. E. (2021). New Technologies of State Supervision Over Labor in the Context of Economic Digitalization. Dalam Stud. Syst. Decis. Control (Vol. 314, hlm. 169–179). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_19
Kunz, R. (2023). Tackling Threats to Academic Freedom Beyond the State: The Potential of Societal Constitutionalism in Protecting the Autonomy of Science in the Digital Era. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 30(2), 265–291. Scopus.
Kurniawan, N., & Putri, M. C. (2022). DIGITAL CONSTITUTIONALISM ERA IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BANKING LAW IN INDONESIA. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions, 1(3), 431–454. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i3.29
Leal, C. R. F., & Rodrigues, D. R. N. (2020). The precarization of work in the digital age and its impact on labor-environmental balance. Veredas do Direito, 17(38), 137–165. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18623/RVD.V17I38.1789
Liaropoulos, A. (2019). In search of a social contract for cybersecurity. Dalam Cruz T. & Simoes P. (Ed.), European Conf. Inf. Warfare Security, ECCWS (Vol. 2019-July, hlm. 282–287). Curran Associates Inc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85070020122&partnerID=40&md5=78bba9e9d8664c0447aed883b1e71560
Maldonado-Meléndez, M. A. (2024). The transit from digital administration towards an algorithmic Public Administration in the era of Artificial Intelligence: The need for a guarantee constitutional and legal system in the provision of public services in Peru. Revista de Derecho Politico, 120, 395–425. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.120.2024.41775
Mascitti, M. (2024). The Metaverse impact on the politics means. Computer Law and Security Review, 55. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106037
Navarro, C. S. (2024). Online information disorders and content moderation in the Digital Age. Revista de Derecho Politico, 121, 203–233. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.121.2024.43073
Petryshyn, O. V., & Hyliaka, O. S. (2021). Human rights in the digital age: Challenges, threats and prospects. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(1), 15–23. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.28(1).2021.15-23
Pevtsova, E., Pevtsova, N., Lavitskaya, M., Redkous, V., & Matveeva, E. (2020). Influence of migration processes in Europe on law and legal culture of information society. Dalam Rudoy D., Olshevskaya A., & Kankhva V. (Ed.), E3S Web Conf. (Vol. 210). EDP Sciences; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021017023
Pollicino, O. (2021). Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet: A Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism? Dalam Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet: A Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism? (hlm. 235). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85190327414&partnerID=40&md5=0086f35f360446abcf7c35cb8fee67d9
Pollicino, O. (2023). The quadrangular shape of the geometry of digital power(s) and the move towards a procedural digital constitutionalism. European Law Journal, 29(1–2), 10–30. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12472
Rattanasevee, P., Akarapattananukul, Y., & Chirawut, Y. (2024). Direct democracy in the digital age: Opportunities, challenges, and new approaches. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04245-1
Saarenpää, A. (2024). SOME DIFFICULTIES IN READING THE LAW IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Jusletter IT, 39–46. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.38023/55efd5c7-2713-4965-8210-8f5ff36b4f13
Shade, L. R., & Werbin, K. C. (2024). What Hath Dobbs Wrought? Abortion activism in precarious and punitive times. Journal of Gender Studies. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2357799
Shen, T. (2024). Right to learn in the digital age: Challenges and protection in China. Computer Law and Security Review, 53. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105989
Tokson, M. (2022). THE AFTERMATH OF CARPENTER: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF FOURTH AMENDMENT LAW, 2018–2021†. Harvard Law Review, 135(7), 1790–1852. Scopus.
Wani, S. A., & Mansoor, S. I. U. (2025). Criminal justice system in the age of artificial intelligence: Exploring rights, risks, and responsibilities in the digital era. Dalam Artif. Intell. In Peace, Justice, and Strong Inst. (hlm. 67–92). IGI Global; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9395-6.ch004
Wolff, D. (2018). Fundamental Rights in the Digital Era, Horizontal Effect and the Distinction Between “State” and “Society” in German and European Constitutional Theory. Frontiers of Law in China, 13(3), 441–455. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-007-018-0033-1
Wu, Y. (2021). The Conflict and Countermeasures of Privacy Protection in Criminal Electronic Forensics. Proc. Int. Conf. Trends Electron. Informatics, ICOEI, 576–579. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI51242.2021.9452993
Yadav, A. B., & Mane, S. (2022). Online Stream and Recording of Court Proceedings: A Constitutional Right. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 13(2), 171–189. Scopus.
Zernik, J. (2019). Israeli central election committee and the 2019 election: An e-government case study. Dalam Kaya T. (Ed.), Proc. European Conf. On e-Gov., ECEG (Vol. 2019-October, hlm. 236–245). Academic Conferences Limited; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.34190/ECDG.19.062
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Clara Reyes, Luis Santos, Josefa Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
