The Legal Vacuum of Labor Protection for Freelancers in the Technology Sector
Downloads
Background. The rapid growth of the technology sector has created numerous new job opportunities, especially for freelancers. However, alongside the flexibility it offers, there exists a significant legal vacuum in labor protection for workers in this sector. Freelancers are often not recognized as “workers” under the law, resulting in a lack of protection such as social security, health insurance, pension benefits, and other employment rights. This regulatory gap creates vulnerabilities for workers concerning income uncertainty, exploitation, and work-related stress. This article discusses the legal vacuum and its impact on the physical, mental, and social well-being of freelancers in the technology sector, as well as proposing necessary steps to create more inclusive labor protection. More adaptive and comprehensive policy changes are required to address the challenges faced by freelancers in this digital economy era.
Purpose. The growing gig economy, particularly in technology, has brought forward new forms of employment. However, these freelance roles often fall outside traditional labor laws, leading to gaps in protections and rights.
Method. A qualitative analysis was conducted through interviews with freelancers and legal experts, along with a review of existing labor laws.
Results. Freelancers face significant vulnerabilities, including lack of health insurance and pension benefits, leading to increased financial instability and work-related stress.
Conclusion. A comprehensive overhaul of labor laws is necessary to protect freelancers, ensuring they have access to benefits such as health insurance, pension plans, and social security.
Acero, C., & Thomson, F. (2022). ‘Everything peasants do is illegal’: Colombian coca growers’ everyday experiences of law enforcement and its impacts on state legitimacy. Third World Quarterly, 43(11), 2674–2692. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1971517
Alrejjal, A., Moomen, M., & Ksaibati, K. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of law enforcement in reducing truck crashes for a rural mountainous freeway in Wyoming. Transportation Letters, 14(8), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2021.1949089
Bielska-Brodziak, A., & Suska, M. (2023). Pewno?? prawa a zasada interpretatio retro non agit. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spo?ecznej, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2023.3.51
Cammack, M. (2022). Legal Certainty in the Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Critique and Friendly Suggestion. In M. Crouch (Ed.), Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (1st ed., pp. 275–298). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192870681.003.0014
Dujmovi?, A., & Gadžo, S. (2023). Porezna zastara u svjetlu zahtjeva pravne sigurnosti: Prijepori iz hrvatskog i bosanskohercegova?kog zakonodavstva i prakse. Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveu?ilišta u Rijeci, 44(1), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.44.1.8
García Yzaguirre, V. (2023). Aproximaciones a la seguridad jurídica. Una propuesta de reconstrucción. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía Del Derecho, 50, 29–56. https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.50.26379
Gumelar, K. (2021). Soul Shaking as Reason for Criminal Abolition: The Dilemma Between Legal Certainty and Justice/Keguncangan Jiwa Sebagai Alasan Penghapus Pidana: Dilema Antara Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.12056
Helim, A., Suradilaga, A. S., Benevolent, W. S. V., & Adawiyah, R. (2023). Cumulative Versus Alternative Conditions: A Study of Polygyny Permits in Indonesia From the Perspective of the Legal Certainty Principle. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 15(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i1.15384
Henckels, C. (2023). Justifying the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in International Investment Law: Legal Certainty and Arbitrary Conduct. ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 38(2), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siac027
Hutahayan, B., Fadli, M., Amimakmur, S. A., & Dewantara, R. (2024). Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: Evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2332950. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332950
Jan, B. (2021). Increasing Legal Certainty without Trust: Why Regulation 2019/515 Cannot Achieve the Unachievable. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12(1), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.61
Kocher, E. (2024). “Legal certainty” for live?in work in Germany: A strategy for formalization? International Labour Review, 163(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12434
Lasi?ski-Sulecki, K. (2024). Article: Legal Certainty in Tax and Customs Judgments of the Court of Justice. EC Tax Review, 33(Issue 2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2024008
Maskun, Mukarramah, N. H. A., Bachril, S. N., & Assidiq, H. (2021). Preservation of Rammang-Rammang biodiversity: Questioning legal certainty of local community. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 886(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/886/1/012024
Nasrullah, N. (2020). The Manasik of Hajj in Indonesia: Looking for Legal Certainty through the Reasonings of Usul al-Fiqh. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 20(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v20i1.500
Nurdin, R., & Rajab, H. (2020). The Practice of Hajj Substitution in Indonesia: The Search for Legal Certainty through Usul al-Fiqh Approach. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 20(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v20i2.576
Oral, N., & Aurescu, B. (2024). Sea Level Rise and Maritime Boundaries: The Case for Stability, Legal Certainty, and Peaceful Relations. In C. N. Brower, J. E. Donoghue, C. C. Murphy, C. R. Payne, & E. R. Shirlow (Eds.), By Peaceful Means (1st ed., pp. 437–458). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848086.003.0023
Papis-Almansa, M., & Herbain, C. A. (2023). EU Value Added Tax and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Ben Terra (M. Papis-Almansa, Ed.). IBFD. https://doi.org/10.59403/1gx5n73
Pinheiro, A. A., & Oliveira, L. P. S. (2022). A regulação por incentivo como uma alternativa de segurança jurídica em leilões de telefonia móvel. A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, 22(89), 143. https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v22i89.1431
Pino, G. (2023). Seguridad jurídica. EUNOMÍA. Revista En Cultura de La Legalidad, 25, 262–284. https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2023.8000
Quereda Sabater, J. (2024). «¿Dónde va qué?». Los problemas de la regulación jurídica de la obligación de entrega separada de residuos domésticos: Certezas, dudas e insuficiencias. Cuadernos de Derecho Local, 238–277. https://doi.org/10.61521/cuadernosderecholocal.65.975
Rodríguez Rodrigo, J. (2023). La aplicación del artículo 1320 CC como orden público en el ordenamiento español. A propósito de la resolución de 31 de enero de 2022, de la Dirección General de Seguridad Jurídica y Fe Pública. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 15(1), 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2023.7582
Sadino, & Wiyono, B. (2024). Law study about confirmation of forest area towards legal certainty of forest area in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1407(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1407/1/012018
Šafranko, Z. (2024). Klasifikacija ugovora ratione personae i pravna sigurnost. Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveu?ilišta u Rijeci, 45(2), 443–465. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.45.2.8
Sari, E., Yamin, M., Purba, H., & Sembiring, R. (2022). Land Procurement for Public Interest Against Destroyed Land: Natural Events and Legal Certaint. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(6), 1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-06-06
Schumann, C. (2024). Rechtssicherheit und -kenntnisse in der Intensivmedizin: Auswertung einer quantitativen deutschlandweiten Umfrage. Schumann C, Wachter M, Eslauer E, Angeli R, Girrbach F, Heller AR et al: Rechtssicherheit und -kenntnisse in der Intensivmedizin: Auswertung einer quantitativen deutschlandweiten Umfrage, 2–2024, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.19224/ai2024.040
?it Kö?gero?lu, B. (2022). Performance of Characteristic Obligation in Multiple Places under Brussels I Recast Article 7(1)(b): Legal Certainty and Predictability over “a Close Connection.” Annales de La Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, 0(0), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2022.71.0005
Stavridou, S. (2021). Copyright in the Digital Single Market in Europe: The Quest for Legal Certainty Still Remains. GRUR International, 70(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa166
Teijeiro, G. O., & Vázquez, J. M. (2023). The Application of the Principal Purpose Test and Domestic General Anti-Avoidance Rules and Specific Anti-Avoidance Rules in Latin America: In Search of Legal Certainty. Bulletin for International Taxation, 77(9). https://doi.org/10.59403/g7agy6
Yu, H., & Nie, M. (2023). Acceding to the Moon Agreement to acquire legal certainty: An optional solution for China in the new era of lunar exploration and exploitation. Acta Astronautica, 212, 665–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.08.035
Copyright (c) 2024 Azhari Sauqi, Suparno Suparno

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.