The Influence of Government Policy on the Growth of Technology Startups in Malaysia and Indonesia

Dara Vann (1), Ravi Dara (2), Chak Sothy (3)
(1) Royal University Agriculture, Cambodia,
(2) South East University, Cambodia,
(3) Dai Viet University, Cambodia

Abstract

The growth of technology startups is crucial to the economic development of emerging economies in Southeast Asia, particularly in Malaysia and Indonesia. Government policies play a significant role in shaping the entrepreneurial landscape by providing the necessary infrastructure, funding opportunities, and regulatory support. Despite the importance of government intervention, there remains a lack of comprehensive studies comparing the impact of government policies on the growth of technology startups in both Malaysia and Indonesia. This study aims to explore the influence of government policies on the development of technology startups in these two countries, examining the differences in approach, implementation, and outcomes. The research utilizes a comparative case study approach, employing both qualitative and quantitative methods. Data were collected through interviews with technology startup founders, government representatives, and industry experts, complemented by a review of secondary data from government reports and startup incubators. The study reveals that government policies in both countries have significantly influenced the growth of technology startups, with Malaysia’s more structured and long-term policy frameworks yielding better results in fostering innovation and scalability. On the other hand, Indonesia’s policies, while supportive, face challenges related to bureaucracy and inconsistent implementation. In conclusion, the research highlights the critical role of government policies in enabling the growth of technology startups. While Malaysia has been more successful in creating a conducive environment for innovation, Indonesia's startup ecosystem requires further policy refinement and consistent enforcement to accelerate growth. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and entrepreneurs seeking to enhance the startup ecosystem in Southeast Asia.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Abadía, A. (2021). Study on Leadership and Innovation: Clues for Success in Technology-related Startups. Cuadernos de Gestion, 21(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.191140aa

Adebayo, T. S. (2023). Formulating sustainable development policies for China within the framework of socioeconomic conditions and government stability. Environmental Pollution, 328(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121673

Aleluia, J. (2022). Accelerating a clean energy transition in Southeast Asia: Role of governments and public policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112226

Altiparmakis, A. (2021). Pandemic politics: Policy evaluations of government responses to COVID-19. West European Politics, 44(5), 1159–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1930754

Audretsch, D. B. (2022). Necessity or opportunity? Government size, tax policy, corruption, and implications for entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2025–2042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00497-2

Barker, T. H. (2022). Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: An overview of methods and the development process. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125

Barman, A. (2021). Optimal pricing and greening strategy in a competitive green supply chain: Impact of government subsidy and tax policy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169178

Bauer, G. R. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM - Population Health, 14(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798

Beke, D. D. (2023). What managers can learn from knowledge intensive technology startups? Exploring the skillset for developing adaptive organizational learning capabilities of a successful start-up enterprise in management education. Society and Economy, 45(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2022.00027

Cairney, P. (2021). The UK government’s COVID-19 policy: Assessing evidence-informed policy analysis in real time. British Politics, 16(1), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-020-00150-8

Chakraborty, I. (2023). What is coming next in health technology startups? Some insights and practice guidelines. Digital Health, 9(Query date: 2024-12-08 00:30:58). https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231178435

Demir, E. (2021). Banking sector reactions to COVID-19: The role of bank-specific factors and government policy responses. Research in International Business and Finance, 58(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101508

Dung, P. T. P. (2023). Understanding the startup’s intention of digital marketing’s learners: An application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and technology acceptance method (TAM). Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219415

Fan, R. (2022). How do government policies affect the diffusion of green innovation among peer enterprises? - An evolutionary-game model in complex networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132711

Gao, K. (2022). Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China. Technology in Society, 70(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102035

Gu, B. (2021). The policy effect of green finance in promoting industrial transformation and upgrading efficiency in China: Analysis from the perspective of government regulation and public environmental demands. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(34), 47474–47491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13944-0

Gupta, V. (2022). Strategic Prototyping Technology Adoption in Startups: Framework, Challenges, and Opportunities. IT Professional, 24(3), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2022.3172876

Gupta, V. (2024). Study protocol for factors influencing the adoption of ChatGPT technology by startups: Perceptions and attitudes of entrepreneurs. PLoS ONE, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298427

Hale, T. (2021). A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature Human Behaviour, 5(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8

He, L. (2021). The incentive effects of different government subsidy policies on green buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110123

Jáki, E. (2022). Technology-Oriented Startups in the Intersection of Industry 4.0, Venture Capital Financing and Business Scaling – Empirical Examples from the Automotive Industry –. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Query date: 2024-12-08 00:30:58, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81663-6_4

Jian, C. (2020). Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling. PLoS ONE, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227285

Jiang, Z. (2023). Policy incentives, government subsidies, and technological innovation in new energy vehicle enterprises: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 177(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113527

Jorzik, P. (2024). Sowing the seeds for sustainability: A business model innovation perspective on artificial intelligence in green technology startups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208(Query date: 2024-12-08 00:30:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123653

Khursheed, A. (2024). Role of innovation ambidexterity in technology startup performance: An empirical study. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 36(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.2020235

Li, Z. (2020). From community-acquired pneumonia to COVID-19: A deep learning–based method for quantitative analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT scans. European Radiology, 30(12), 6828–6837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07042-x

Lyulyov, O. (2021). The impact of the government policy on the energy efficient gap: The evidence from Ukraine. Energies, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020373

Meng, Q. (2021). Pricing policies of dual-channel green supply chain: Considering government subsidies and consumers’ dual preferences. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26), 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.012

Olaye, I. M. (2023). The Gap Between AI and Bedside: Participatory Workshop on the Barriers to the Integration, Translation, and Adoption of Digital Health Care and AI Startup Technology Into Clinical Practice. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(Query date: 2024-12-08 00:30:58). https://doi.org/10.2196/32962

Ramos, A. G. (2022). Technology roadmap for the development of a 3D cell culture workstation for a biomedical industry startup. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174(Query date: 2024-12-08 00:30:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121213

Sanasi, S. (2023). What happens after market validation? Experimentation for scaling in technology-based startups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196(Query date: 2024-12-08 00:30:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122839

Theis, D. R. Z. (2021). Is Obesity Policy in England Fit for Purpose? Analysis of Government Strategies and Policies, 1992–2020. Milbank Quarterly, 99(1), 126–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12498

Toshkov, D. (2022). Government capacity, societal trust or party preferences: What accounts for the variety of national policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 29(7), 1009–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1928270

Tu, S. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 97(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11), 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29592

Wang, E. (2024). Reviewing direct air capture startups and emerging technologies. Cell Reports Physical Science, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.101791

Wang, H. (2022). Green credit policy, government behavior and green innovation quality of enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129834

Young, M. L. (2021). When gender, colonialism, and technology matter in a journalism startup. Journalism, 22(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917743390

Zahra, S. A. (2022). The effect of MNEs’ technology startup acquisitions on small open economies’ entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of International Business Policy, 5(3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-021-00128-3

Zaremba, A. (2021). COVID-19, government policy responses, and stock market liquidity around the world: A note. Research in International Business and Finance, 56(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101359

Zhang, X. m. (2021). Optimal pricing and remanufacturing mode in a closed-loop supply chain of WEEE under government fund policy. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 151(Query date: 2024-12-08 07:29:26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106951

Authors

Dara Vann
daravann@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Ravi Dara
Chak Sothy
Vann, D., Dara, R., & Sothy, C. (2024). The Influence of Government Policy on the Growth of Technology Startups in Malaysia and Indonesia. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology, 1(3), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.70177/jseact.v1i3.1727

Article Details