Determinants of The Realization of Indonesian Resin Commodity Exports
Abstract
Indonesia’s plastic resin sector has a lot of promise for both local and foreign consumers in terms of its industrial and marketing prospects. The packaging of food, cosmetics, electronics, plastic pipes, home appliances, automobiles, and other products is closely associated with the plastics sector. The growth of this industry will inevitably promote the growth of the nation’s plastic resin sector. The building, automotive, and environmental industries present a wealth of growth opportunities for Indonesia’s resin industry, which has extremely bright futures. Indonesia can establish a resin sector that is both competitive and sustainable in the global market by focusing on innovation, investing in technology, and enacting the appropriate policies. Analyzing the effects of production volume, selling price, investment, and currency exchange rate on the realization of Indonesian resin commodity exports is the goal of this study. This study aimed to examine the impact of resin production volume, selling prices, investment, and exchange rates on Indonesian resin commodity export realization.The Error Correction Model (ECM) is the data analysis technique employed in this investigation. The findings demonstrated that the realization of resin commodity exports was significantly and favorably impacted by production volume, selling price, and investment. The realization of resin commodity exports is significantly and negatively impacted by the rupiah’s exchange rate against US dollars, both in the short and long terms.
Full text article
References
Adabi, H. (2021). High-performing commercial Fe–N–C cathode electrocatalyst for anion-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Energy, 6(8), 834–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00878-7
Barker, T. H. (2022). Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: An overview of methods and the development process. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125
Bi, C. (2021). Perovskite Quantum Dots with Ultralow Trap Density by Acid Etching-Driven Ligand Exchange for High Luminance and Stable Pure-Blue Light-Emitting Diodes. Advanced Materials, 33(15). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006722
Chen, N. (2021a). High-performance anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers with a current density of 7.68 A cm-2and a durability of 1000 hours. Energy and Environmental Science, 14(12), 6338–6348. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee02642a
Chen, N. (2021b). Poly(fluorenyl aryl piperidinium) membranes and ionomers for anion exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22612-3
Chen, Z. (2022). Advances in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers. Advanced Energy Materials, 12(14). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202103670
Chong, L. (2023). La- and Mn-doped cobalt spinel oxygen evolution catalyst for proton exchange membrane electrolysis. Science, 380(6645), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ADE1499
Dehghani, M. (2021). Blockchain?based securing of data exchange in a power transmission system considering congestion management and social welfare. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010090
Dixit, F. (2021). PFAS removal by ion exchange resins: A review. Chemosphere, 272(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129777
Dorninger, C. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological Economics, 179(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824
Du, L. (2021). Low-PGM and PGM-Free Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Stability Challenges and Material Solutions. Advanced Materials, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201908232
Du, N. (2022). Anion-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers. Chemical Reviews, 122(13), 11830–11895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00854
Fan, J. (2021). Bridging the gap between highly active oxygen reduction reaction catalysts and effective catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Energy, 6(5), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00824-7
Haider, R. (2021). High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Progress in advanced materials and key technologies. Chemical Society Reviews, 50(2), 1138–1187. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00296h
Han, E. (2022). Model identification of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells based on a hybrid convolutional neural network and extreme learning machine optimized by improved honey badger algorithm. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102005
Hao, S. (2021). Torsion strained iridium oxide for efficient acidic water oxidation in proton exchange membrane electrolyzers. Nature Nanotechnology, 16(12), 1371–1377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00986-1
Henkensmeier, D. (2021). Overview: State-of-the Art Commercial Membranes for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047963
Hickel, J. (2022). Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015. Global Environmental Change, 73(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102467
Hu, T. (2021). Movable oil content evaluation of lacustrine organic-rich shales: Methods and a novel quantitative evaluation model. Earth-Science Reviews, 214(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103545
Jiao, K. (2021). Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature, 595(7867), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03482-7
Li, C. (2021). The promise of hydrogen production from alkaline anion exchange membrane electrolyzers. Nano Energy, 87(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106162
Li, D. (2021). Durability of anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Energy and Environmental Science, 14(6), 3393–3419. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee04086j
Li, J. (2021). Identification of durable and non-durable FeN x sites in Fe–N–C materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Catalysis, 4(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-00545-2
Liu, Y. (2021). Insight into the Critical Role of Exchange Current Density on Electrodeposition Behavior of Lithium Metal. Advanced Science, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003301
Mehmood, A. (2022). High loading of single atomic iron sites in Fe–NC oxygen reduction catalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Catalysis, 5(4), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00772-9
Nooraie, R. Y. (2020). Social Network Analysis: An Example of Fusion Between Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818804060
Prykhodko, Y. (2021). Progress in hybrid composite Nafion®-based membranes for proton exchange fuel cell application. Chemical Engineering Journal, 409(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127329
Qu, E. (2022). Proton exchange membranes for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Challenges and perspectives. Journal of Power Sources, 533(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231386
Salvatore, D. A. (2021). Designing anion exchange membranes for CO2 electrolysers. Nature Energy, 6(4), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00761-x
Sun, Y. (2021). Advancements in cathode catalyst and cathode layer design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25911-x
Wang, X. R. (2021). Review on water management methods for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(22), 12206–12229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.211
Wu, Z. Y. (2023). Non-iridium-based electrocatalyst for durable acidic oxygen evolution reaction in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Nature Materials, 22(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01380-5
Xiao, F. (2021). Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells and Alkaline Membrane Fuel Cells. Advanced Materials, 33(50). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006292
Xiao, F. (2022). Atomically dispersed Pt and Fe sites and Pt–Fe nanoparticles for durable proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Catalysis, 5(6), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00796-1
Xie, X. (2022). Fe Single-Atom Catalysts on MOF-5 Derived Carbon for Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Advanced Energy Materials, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102688
Zeng, R. (2021). Versatile Synthesis of Hollow Metal Sulfides via Reverse Cation Exchange Reactions for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 60(47), 25055–25062. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202110670
Zhao, J. (2021). Carbon corrosion mechanism and mitigation strategies in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC): A review. Journal of Power Sources, 488(Query date: 2024-12-06 08:55:38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229434
Zhu, M. (2021). Single Atomic Cerium Sites with a High Coordination Number for Efficient Oxygen Reduction in Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. ACS Catalysis, 11(7), 3923–3929. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c05503
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Ferry Noldy Langelo, Heru Subiantoro, Elmiwati Elmiwati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.